PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCPYX vs. SEBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) and Touchstone Balanced Fund (SEBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCPYX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SEBLX's 3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TCPYX has underperformed SEBLX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while SEBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


TCPYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.55%

SEBLX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.09%
YTD
3.86%
6M
4.58%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
0.31%6.75%1.77%5.32%-13.07%-1.01%6.72%7.91%0.16%3.94%
SEBLX
Touchstone Balanced Fund
3.86%13.59%13.08%18.17%-16.16%13.95%18.74%39.05%-2.74%15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TCPYX and SEBLX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

-0.05

The correlation between TCPYX and SEBLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCPYX vs. SEBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCPYX
TCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SEBLX
SEBLX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SEBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SEBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) and Touchstone Balanced Fund (SEBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCPYXSEBLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

2.04

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.94

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.03

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

8.74

-3.37

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the SEBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCPYX and SEBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCPYXSEBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.04

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.62

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.93

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.77

-0.08

Drawdowns

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCPYX drawdown since its inception was -18.12%, smaller than the maximum SEBLX drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPYX and SEBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCPYXSEBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.12%

-36.70%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-8.30%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.79%

-11.60%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-22.47%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.12%

-22.47%

+4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

0.00%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-3.84%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.92%

-0.96%

Volatility

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) is 1.47%, while Touchstone Balanced Fund (SEBLX) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that TCPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCPYXSEBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.11%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

6.44%

-3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

8.25%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

11.24%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

12.19%

-7.34%

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCPYX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SEBLX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCPYX vs. SEBLX - Dividend Comparison

TCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than SEBLX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEBLX
Touchstone Balanced Fund
4.84%5.03%1.83%1.26%0.99%2.74%7.72%24.06%7.04%6.00%1.98%5.91%
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
3.94%3.52%3.68%3.22%2.63%1.91%2.13%2.63%2.86%2.77%2.98%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCPYX and SEBLX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEBLX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to TCPYX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCPYX dropped -18.12% vs SEBLX's -36.70%.

SEBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCPYX and SEBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer