TCPB vs. IUSB
TCPB (Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF) and IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. TCPB is actively managed, while IUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, TCPB returned 5.55% vs 5.05% for IUSB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCPB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IUSB.
Performance
TCPB vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TCPB having a 0.58% return and IUSB slightly lower at 0.56%.
TCPB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
TCPB vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCPB Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 6.30% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCPB and IUSB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TCPB and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCPB vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
TCPB
IUSB
TCPB vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF (TCPB) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCPB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.01 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 6.08 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCPB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.46 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
TCPB vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCPB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPB and IUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCPB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -17.90% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -2.53% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.20% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -3.59% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.83% | +0.08% |
Volatility
TCPB vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF (TCPB) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.24%. This indicates that TCPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCPB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 1.24% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 2.62% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 3.62% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 5.79% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 5.04% | -0.60% |
TCPB vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCPB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCPB vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
TCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
TCPB Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.77% | 3.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, TCPB and IUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TCPB has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCPB dropped -2.74% vs IUSB's -17.90%.
On 1-year performance, TCPB leads with 5.55% vs 5.05% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TCPB has performed better with a 5.55% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TCPB.
TCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TCPB and 0.06% for IUSB.
IUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCPB and IUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer