PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLFX vs. TIEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLFX achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than TIEIX's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLFX has underperformed TIEIX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while TIEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


TCLFX

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.44%
6M
3.05%
YTD
4.54%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
7.14%
ALL TIME*
6.11%

TIEIX

1D
1.62%
1M
-0.77%
6M
8.02%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
14.27%
ALL TIME*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLFX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund
4.54%12.77%8.81%12.83%-14.54%9.44%13.22%19.21%-6.41%14.74%
TIEIX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I
9.70%17.04%23.71%25.92%-19.18%25.64%20.82%30.89%-5.27%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLFX and TIEIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.95

The correlation between TCLFX and TIEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLFX vs. TIEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCLFX
TCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TIEIX
TIEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TIEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TIEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCLFXTIEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.10

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

9.05

-0.86

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the TIEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLFX and TIEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLFX drawdown since its inception was -48.12%, smaller than the maximum TIEIX drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLFX and TIEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLFXTIEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.12%

-55.55%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-8.84%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-19.29%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-25.06%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.98%

-34.90%

+11.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.79%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-10.25%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.05%

-0.75%

Volatility

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) is 2.12%, while Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that TCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLFXTIEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

3.40%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

10.23%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.13%

13.10%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

17.42%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.55%

18.40%

-8.85%

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TIEIX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLFX vs. TIEIX - Dividend Comparison

TCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than TIEIX's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCLFX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund
4.60%4.81%3.42%2.14%5.63%7.38%4.75%3.53%6.46%2.33%5.05%4.79%
TIEIX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I
2.18%2.39%1.63%1.47%1.83%2.08%1.43%1.99%2.45%0.52%2.45%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TCLFX and TIEIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIEIX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TCLFX (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLFX dropped -48.12% vs TIEIX's -55.55%.

TCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLFX and TIEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer