PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLFX vs. FRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLFX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than FRIMX's 3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLFX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 7.75%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.


TCLFX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.33%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.18%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
7.75%

FRIMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.59%
6M
3.58%
1Y
9.08%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLFX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund
5.39%12.77%8.81%12.83%-14.54%9.44%13.22%19.21%-6.41%14.74%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.59%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLFX and FRIMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.91

The correlation between TCLFX and FRIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (10 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLFX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLFX
TCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCLFXFRIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.74

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

11.49

+0.15

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FRIMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLFX and FRIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLFX drawdown since its inception was -48.12%, which is greater than FRIMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLFX and FRIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLFXFRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.12%

-33.73%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-3.44%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-4.97%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-16.12%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.98%

-16.12%

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.44%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-3.70%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.82%

+0.44%

Volatility

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) at 1.68%. This indicates that TCLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLFXFRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

1.68%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.73%

3.68%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.90%

4.36%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.61%

5.32%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.63%

4.54%

+5.09%

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLFX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

TCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FRIMX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.24%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%
TCLFX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund
4.56%4.81%3.42%2.14%5.63%7.38%4.75%3.53%6.46%2.33%5.05%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCLFX and FRIMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCLFX has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FRIMX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLFX dropped -48.12% vs FRIMX's -33.73%.

FRIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLFX and FRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer