PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLEX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLEX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 13.43% return.


TCLEX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.37%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.61%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
5.87%

FWLSX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.32%
YTD
13.43%
6M
15.50%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
4.09%11.22%7.31%10.64%-12.64%6.62%10.95%15.14%-4.14%3.43%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
13.43%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-8.33%10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLEX and FWLSX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between TCLEX and FWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLEX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLEX
TCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCLEXFWLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.52

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

3.47

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.34

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.38

14.83

-1.45

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLEX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCLEXFWLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.52

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.78

-0.17

Drawdowns

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLEX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, which is greater than FWLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLEX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLEXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-31.32%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-9.49%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.25%

-15.38%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.31%

-27.40%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-5.43%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.14%

-1.18%

Volatility

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) is 1.67%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that TCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLEXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

4.11%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

10.31%

-6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07%

12.60%

-7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.90%

15.10%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

16.06%

-9.06%

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLEX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLEX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

TCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FWLSX's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.04%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%0.00%0.00%
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
5.12%5.33%4.44%2.95%5.91%8.53%6.93%3.95%5.60%1.72%3.45%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TCLEX and FWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to TCLEX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLEX dropped -35.33% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLEX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer