TCLEX vs. FDFPX
TCLEX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund) and FDFPX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TCLEX returned 4.21%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for FDFPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCLEX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FDFPX.
Performance
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLEX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 13.32% return.
TCLEX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.87%
FDFPX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 13.32%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 30.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | 4.09% | 11.22% | 7.31% | 10.64% | -12.64% | 6.62% | 10.95% | 4.59% |
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 13.32% | 22.81% | 17.81% | 20.93% | -18.57% | 16.84% | 18.54% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLEX and FDFPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TCLEX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCLEX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLEX
FDFPX
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLEX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 2.51 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 3.46 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.27 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | 14.53 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLEX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.81 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLEX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, which is greater than FDFPX's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLEX and FDFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLEX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -31.22% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.28% | -9.54% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.25% | -15.42% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.31% | -27.41% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -5.86% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 2.15% | -1.19% |
Volatility
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) is 1.67%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that TCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCLEX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 4.13% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 10.32% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.07% | 12.57% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 15.09% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 17.18% | -10.18% |
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLEX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCLEX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison
TCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FDFPX's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 3.77% | 2.87% | 6.56% | 2.22% | 5.41% | 8.52% | 5.38% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | 5.12% | 5.33% | 4.44% | 2.95% | 5.91% | 8.53% | 6.93% | 3.95% | 5.60% | 1.72% | 3.45% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TCLEX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDFPX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to TCLEX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLEX dropped -35.33% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.
FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCLEX and FDFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer