PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLEX vs. FATKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLEX achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly lower than FATKX's 5.96% return.


TCLEX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.36%
6M
2.42%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.62%
ALL TIME*
5.28%

FATKX

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.88%
6M
3.85%
YTD
5.96%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
3.64%11.22%7.31%10.64%-12.64%6.62%10.95%15.14%-4.14%3.12%
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
5.96%15.14%11.68%13.16%-15.93%9.13%13.79%18.14%-5.20%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLEX and FATKX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between TCLEX and FATKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLEX vs. FATKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCLEX
TCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FATKX
FATKX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FATKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FATKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCLEXFATKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.28

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

9.28

-0.49

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FATKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLEX and FATKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLEX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, which is greater than FATKX's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLEX and FATKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLEXFATKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-22.44%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-5.48%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.25%

-7.30%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.31%

-22.44%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.63%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-4.32%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.34%

-0.34%

Volatility

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) is 1.60%, while Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that TCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FATKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLEXFATKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

2.36%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.62%

6.76%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.51%

7.81%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.97%

9.14%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

9.29%

-2.32%

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLEX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FATKX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLEX vs. FATKX - Dividend Comparison

TCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than FATKX's 8.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
8.00%7.70%8.73%2.94%10.06%12.30%6.93%6.79%7.43%3.18%0.00%0.00%
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
5.14%5.33%4.44%2.95%5.91%8.53%6.93%3.95%5.60%1.72%3.45%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TCLEX and FATKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FATKX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to TCLEX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLEX dropped -35.33% vs FATKX's -22.44%.

TCLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLEX and FATKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer