PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCEHY vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCEHY vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCEHY achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 232.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TCEHY has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 11.22%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.03% annualized return.


TCEHY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-25.13%
6M
-26.31%
1Y
-13.19%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
-3.77%
10Y*
11.22%

MU

1D
9.87%
1M
27.11%
YTD
232.74%
6M
284.77%
1Y
776.52%
3Y*
144.94%
5Y*
65.39%
10Y*
55.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCEHY vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-25.13%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-23.83%115.30%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
232.74%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TCEHY and MU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2008

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCEHY:

$519.65B

MU:

$1.08T

EPS

TCEHY:

$25.30

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

TCEHY:

2.24

MU:

44.66

PEG Ratio

TCEHY:

0.28

MU:

0.17

PS Ratio

TCEHY:

0.69

MU:

18.53

PB Ratio

TCEHY:

0.46

MU:

14.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCEHY:

$763.32B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCEHY:

$422.60B

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCEHY:

$324.78B

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCEHY vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCEHY vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCEHYMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.81

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

25.90

-26.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

100.37

-101.15

TCEHY vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCEHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 11.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCEHY and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCEHYMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

11.44

-11.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

1.24

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

1.11

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.31

+0.34

Drawdowns

TCEHY vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCEHY drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCEHY and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCEHYMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.17%

-98.25%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.75%

-30.28%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.75%

-57.63%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.18%

-57.63%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

-57.63%

-15.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.45%

-12.07%

-23.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-58.19%

+38.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.95%

7.80%

+9.15%

Volatility

TCEHY vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) is 12.85%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 34.16%. This indicates that TCEHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCEHYMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.85%

34.16%

-21.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

56.74%

-32.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.80%

68.70%

-37.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.23%

52.91%

-9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.84%

49.99%

-11.15%

Dividends

TCEHY vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.19%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

TCEHY vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tencent Holdings Limited and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
195.27B
23.86B
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TCEHY vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tencent Holdings Limited and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
54.6%
74.4%
Portfolio components
TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCEHY and MU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to TCEHY (12.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCEHY dropped -73.17% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCEHY and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer