TCEHY vs. MINT
TCEHY (Tencent Holdings Limited) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, TCEHY returned 11.40%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for MINT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCEHY vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCEHY achieves a -19.03% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TCEHY has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 11.40%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.
TCEHY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- 6M
- -22.69%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 1Y
- -6.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
TCEHY vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited | -19.03% | 45.23% | 41.92% | -5.48% | -24.97% | -18.69% | 50.09% | 21.93% | -23.83% | 115.30% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.28% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCEHY and MINT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009 | 0.00 |
The correlation between TCEHY and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCEHY vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
TCEHY
MINT
TCEHY vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCEHY | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -55.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 16.73 | -15.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 92.04 | -92.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 789.89 | -790.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCEHY vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCEHY drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCEHY and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCEHY | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.17% | -4.62% | -68.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.23% | -0.05% | -38.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.23% | -0.16% | -38.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.90% | -2.42% | -60.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | -4.62% | -68.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.19% | 0.00% | -30.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -0.17% | -19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.11% | 0.01% | +20.10% |
Volatility
TCEHY vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.11%. This indicates that TCEHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCEHY | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.29% | 0.11% | +11.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 0.22% | +25.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.45% | 0.28% | +32.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.29% | 0.58% | +42.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.90% | 0.94% | +37.96% |
Dividends
TCEHY vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than MINT's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.22% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.82% | 6.67% | 4.15% | 0.35% | 0.19% | 0.23% | 0.26% | 0.29% | 0.51% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCEHY and MINT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCEHY has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to MINT (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCEHY dropped -73.17% vs MINT's -4.62%.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.30 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCEHY and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer