PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCCBX vs. USMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCCBX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than USMTX's 0.79% return.


TCCBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.01%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCCBX and USMTX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCCBX vs. USMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCCBX
TCCBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TCCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TCCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

USMTX
USMTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
USMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCCBXUSMTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

5.63

-4.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

8.91

-6.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

49.19

-38.85

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCCBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the USMTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCCBX and USMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCCBXUSMTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

4.52

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

2.12

-0.03

Drawdowns

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCCBX drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum USMTX drawdown of -1.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCCBX and USMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCCBXUSMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-1.98%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-0.30%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.18%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

Volatility

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Volatility Comparison

Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX) at 0.20%. This indicates that TCCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCCBXUSMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.20%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

0.44%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17%

0.59%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

0.72%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

0.75%

+1.48%

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCCBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USMTX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCCBX vs. USMTX - Dividend Comparison

TCCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than USMTX's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCCBX
Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.92%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMTX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
2.52%2.62%3.05%2.58%0.89%0.25%0.76%1.49%1.31%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCCBX and USMTX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCCBX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to USMTX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCCBX dropped -1.77% vs USMTX's -1.98%.

USMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCCBX and USMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer