TCCBX vs. USMTX
TCCBX (Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class) and USMTX (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past year, TCCBX returned 4.02% vs 2.65% for USMTX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCCBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for USMTX.
Performance
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCCBX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than USMTX's 0.79% return.
TCCBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCCBX Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.53% | 3.57% |
USMTX JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund | 0.79% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCCBX and USMTX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCCBX vs. USMTX — Risk / Return Rank
TCCBX
USMTX
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCCBX | USMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 5.63 | -4.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 8.91 | -6.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 49.19 | -38.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCCBX | USMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 4.52 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 2.12 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCCBX drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum USMTX drawdown of -1.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCCBX and USMTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCCBX | USMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -1.98% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.77% | -0.30% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -0.18% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Volatility Comparison
Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX) at 0.20%. This indicates that TCCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCCBX | USMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.20% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 0.44% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17% | 0.59% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 0.72% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 0.75% | +1.48% |
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCCBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USMTX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCCBX vs. USMTX - Dividend Comparison
TCCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than USMTX's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCCBX Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class | 1.92% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMTX JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund | 2.52% | 2.62% | 3.05% | 2.58% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.76% | 1.49% | 1.31% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCCBX and USMTX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCCBX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to USMTX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCCBX dropped -1.77% vs USMTX's -1.98%.
USMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCCBX and USMTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer