TCBX vs. GBCI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) and Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI).

Performance

TCBX vs. GBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) and Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TCBX vs. GBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TCBX Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.	1.53%	11.96%	70.86%	7.81%	-29.06%	3.88%
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc.	2.27%	-9.59%	25.37%	-13.01%	-10.40%	-2.80%

Fundamentals

EPS TCBX : $5.69 GBCI : $3.16
PE Ratio TCBX : 6.79 GBCI : 14.27
PS Ratio TCBX : 1.27 GBCI : 2.63
Total Revenue (TTM) TCBX : $354.03M GBCI : $1.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) TCBX : $146.33M GBCI : $676.53M
EBITDA (TTM) TCBX : $64.78M GBCI : $236.14M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCBX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than GBCI's 2.27% return.

TCBX

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -4.05%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 3.24%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: 34.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBCI

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: -5.09%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: -2.21%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TCBX vs. GBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCBX

TCBX Risk / Return Rank: 58
TCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GBCI

GBCI Risk / Return Rank: 44
GBCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GBCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GBCI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GBCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GBCI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCBX vs. GBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) and Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCBX	GBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.16	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	0.46	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.06	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	0.26	+0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.16	0.54	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCBX vs. GBCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the GBCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCBX and GBCI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCBX	GBCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	0.16	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.26	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between TCBX and GBCI is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TCBX vs. GBCI - Dividend Comparison

TCBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TCBX Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc.	2.93%	3.00%	2.63%	3.19%	2.87%	2.50%	3.00%	3.07%	2.55%	3.66%	3.04%	3.96%

Drawdowns

TCBX vs. GBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCBX drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, smaller than the maximum GBCI drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCBX and GBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCBX	GBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.53%	-63.24%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-19.56%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.21%	-21.20%	+9.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-19.06%	-3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.24%	9.30%	-2.06%

Volatility

TCBX vs. GBCI - Volatility Comparison

Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) and Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCBX	GBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	6.16%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.79%	22.63%	-1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.17%	34.43%	-2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.62%	35.26%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.62%	35.12%	-1.50%

Financials

TCBX vs. GBCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. and Glacier Bancorp, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TCBX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 83.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GBCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 283.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TCBX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 83.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GBCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 283.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TCBX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 17.90M and revenue of 83.44M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

GBCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 63.78M and revenue of 283.46M, resulting in a net margin of 22.5%.