TCAN vs. DECO
TCAN (21Shares Canton Network ETF) and DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DECO.
Performance
TCAN vs. DECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TCAN
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 75.90%
- 6M
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 128.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCAN vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TCAN 21Shares Canton Network ETF | -0.44% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAN and DECO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAN vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank
TCAN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DECO
TCAN vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAN | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAN vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAN drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum DECO drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAN and DECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAN | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -47.71% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.90% | -3.63% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -11.35% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.19% | — |
Volatility
TCAN vs. DECO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAN | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.51% | 44.24% | +20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 51.14% | +13.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 51.14% | +13.37% |
TCAN vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAN vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison
TCAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.66% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
TCAN 21Shares Canton Network ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAN and DECO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TCAN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TCAN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.
DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for TCAN.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TCAN and 0.65% for DECO.
Find the right allocation for TCAN and DECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer