TCAF vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAF returned 17.22% vs 30.46% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

TCAF vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.70% return.

TCAF

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	4.55%	13.91%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	13.70%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and EBI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.85

The correlation between TCAF and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCAF vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF

TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 39
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 84
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCAF	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.46	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.37	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	4.32	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	17.50	-11.50

TCAF vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, roughly equal to the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAF	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-17.05%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-7.09%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-1.43%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-2.03%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	1.75%	+1.13%

Volatility

TCAF vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAF	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	4.03%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	9.27%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	12.49%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	17.88%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	17.88%	-3.86%

TCAF vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAF vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.00%	0.00%
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.43%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAF and EBI in my portfolio?

TCAF and EBI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAF or EBI?

TCAF has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to EBI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, TCAF or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 30.46% vs 17.22% for TCAF. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAF or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 30.46% return vs 17.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAF or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAF or EBI?

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.

What is the main difference between TCAF and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.