PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBX vs. UCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBX vs. UCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than UCON's 0.74% return.


TBX

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.40%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
2.10%

UCON

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBX vs. UCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
3.28%-1.15%8.52%3.99%18.31%1.70%-9.96%-5.20%-2.30%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
0.74%7.00%4.69%7.72%-5.72%1.02%6.54%7.39%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TBX and UCON is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

-0.48

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TBX and UCON has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.48 to -0.88, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBX vs. UCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBX
TBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UCON
UCON Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBX vs. UCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBXUCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.11

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

8.09

-6.21

TBX vs. UCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the UCON Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBX and UCON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBX vs. UCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, which is greater than UCON's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and UCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBXUCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-15.31%

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-2.45%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.77%

-2.85%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.77%

-9.60%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.93%

-0.45%

-16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-1.48%

-25.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.64%

+0.90%

Volatility

TBX vs. UCON - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) at 0.86%. This indicates that TBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBXUCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.86%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

2.38%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

2.99%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

3.90%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

5.88%

+1.26%

TBX vs. UCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UCON's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBX vs. UCON - Dividend Comparison

TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than UCON's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
3.04%3.45%6.58%4.07%0.40%0.00%0.10%1.53%0.72%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.66%4.63%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.25%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBX and UCON have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to UCON (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs UCON's -15.31%.

On 5-year performance, TBX leads with 6.11% vs 2.79% for UCON. On fees, UCON is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, UCON has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TBX has performed better with a 6.11% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UCON is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TBX.

UCON has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.04% for TBX.

TBX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while UCON is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TBX and 0.86% for UCON.

UCON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBX and UCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer