PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBX vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBX vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBX vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
1.57%-1.15%8.52%4.37%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
-0.50%7.57%5.76%7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's -0.50% return.


TBX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.27%
YTD
1.57%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
1.73%

BINC

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBX vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBX vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBX
TBX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBX vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBXBINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

1.79

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

2.36

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.00

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.60

8.16

-7.57

TBX vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBX and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBXBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.79

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

2.32

-2.49

Correlation

The correlation between TBX and BINC is -0.70. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TBX vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than BINC's 5.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
3.09%3.45%6.58%4.07%0.40%0.00%0.10%1.53%0.72%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.92%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TBX vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and BINC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBXBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-2.69%

-38.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.77%

-2.69%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.30%

-1.87%

-16.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-0.33%

-26.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

0.66%

+4.18%

Volatility

TBX vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.29%. This indicates that TBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBXBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.29%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.72%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.65%

2.95%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

3.03%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

3.03%

+4.11%