PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLRX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Balanced II (TBLRX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLRX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.80% return.


TBLRX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.90%
YTD
5.63%
6M
5.83%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*

FSRKX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.07%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TBLRX
Transamerica Balanced II
5.63%12.78%14.47%18.18%-16.46%16.57%15.11%6.05%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.80%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLRX and FSRKX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between TBLRX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLRX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLRX
TBLRX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TBLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Balanced II (TBLRX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLRXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.73

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

8.79

-5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

32.89

-19.71

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLRX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLRXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.61

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.95

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.93

-0.23

Drawdowns

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLRX drawdown since its inception was -25.35%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLRX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLRXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.35%

-19.93%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-1.93%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-5.84%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-12.74%

-12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-3.21%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.51%

+0.82%

Volatility

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Balanced II (TBLRX) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.33%. This indicates that TBLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLRXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

1.33%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

3.67%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

4.71%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

6.94%

+7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

7.79%

+6.13%

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLRX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLRX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

TBLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.15%, more than FSRKX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.25%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%
TBLRX
Transamerica Balanced II
29.15%30.86%14.76%3.31%5.67%9.15%4.58%3.60%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLRX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLRX has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to FSRKX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLRX dropped -25.35% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLRX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer