PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLNX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2060 Fund (TBLNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLNX achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


TBLNX

1D
0.42%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.43%
6M
13.10%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10Y*

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLNX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2060 Fund
12.43%20.54%15.09%21.23%-18.13%4.11%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLNX and FTLSX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.69

The correlation between TBLNX and FTLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLNX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLNX
TBLNX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TBLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2060 Fund (TBLNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLNXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.55

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.32

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

14.65

-1.28

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLNX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLNXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.67

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.96

-0.30

Drawdowns

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLNX drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLNX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLNXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-15.74%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-3.65%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-4.83%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-2.81%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.82%

+1.32%

Volatility

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2060 Fund (TBLNX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that TBLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLNXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

1.79%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

3.80%

+5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

4.54%

+7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

5.43%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

4.78%

+10.83%

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLNX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLNX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

TBLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%
TBLNX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2060 Fund
2.17%2.44%1.94%1.68%2.09%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLNX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLNX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLNX dropped -26.65% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLNX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer