TBLL vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. TBLL is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBLL returned 3.35%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for MINT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

TBLL vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.

TBLL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLL vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	1.43%	4.21%	5.11%	5.01%	1.11%	-0.01%	0.93%	2.20%	1.85%	0.62%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLL and MINT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017	0.28

The correlation between TBLL and MINT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TBLL vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLL

TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLL vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBLL	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	20.94	17.09	+3.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	218.31	65.54	+152.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	102.92	20.53	+82.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	416.84	94.30	+322.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3,533.11	939.26	+2,593.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBLL vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLL Sharpe Ratio is 20.94, which is comparable to the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLL and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBLL	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.94	17.09	+3.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	7.53	5.99	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.26	2.47	+1.79

Drawdowns

TBLL vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLL	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-4.62%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.01%	-0.05%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.36%	-0.16%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.36%	-2.42%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.14%	-0.17%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Volatility

TBLL vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.05%, while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) has a volatility of 0.09%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLL	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.05%	0.09%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.12%	0.20%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19%	0.27%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.45%	0.58%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.56%	0.95%	-0.39%

TBLL vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBLL vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	3.81%	4.08%	4.99%	4.63%	1.37%	0.03%	0.80%	2.08%	1.69%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLL and MINT in my portfolio?

TBLL and MINT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLL or MINT?

MINT has higher volatility (0.09%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, TBLL or MINT?

On 5-year performance, MINT leads with 3.47% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBLL or MINT?

Over the 5-year period, MINT has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBLL or MINT?

TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBLL or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.81% for TBLL.

What is the main difference between TBLL and MINT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 17.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.