TBLL vs. COMB
TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. TBLL is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBLL returned 3.35%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for COMB. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
TBLL vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
TBLL vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.43% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.47% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLL and COMB is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLL vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
TBLL
COMB
TBLL vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLL | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +215.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 102.92 | 1.41 | +101.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 416.84 | 5.08 | +411.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3,533.11 | 13.24 | +3,519.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLL | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94 | 2.29 | +18.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.53 | 0.68 | +6.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.26 | 0.52 | +3.74 |
Drawdowns
TBLL vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLL | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -33.50% | +32.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -7.69% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -11.35% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | -26.63% | +26.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.35% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -12.06% | +11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.94% | -2.94% |
Volatility
TBLL vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.05%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLL | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 5.14% | -5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 14.99% | -14.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 17.02% | -16.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 16.70% | -16.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 15.13% | -14.57% |
TBLL vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLL vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than COMB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLL and COMB have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 11.27% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 3.81% for TBLL.
TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.25% for COMB.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLL and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer