TBLL vs. CLOZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and CLOZ (Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Eldridge. TBLL is passively managed, while CLOZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBLL returned 4.55%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for CLOZ. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 3.25% return.

TBLL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 1.73%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 1Y: 3.77%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.40%

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 2.00%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 9.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	$9.15M	$11.73M	$8.72M
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	$32.87M	$26.31M	$27.42M

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	2.02%	4.21%	5.11%	4.74%
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	3.25%	5.99%	11.85%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLL and CLOZ is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

TBLL vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBLL

TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBLL	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	19.52	1.72	+17.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	120.85	2.21	+118.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	44.43	1.43	+43.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	199.85	1.54	+198.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,954.23	5.12	+1,949.11

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLL Sharpe Ratio is 19.52, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLL and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLL	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-5.32%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-3.90%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.36%	-5.32%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.13%	-0.37%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	1.17%	-1.17%

Volatility

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.07%, while Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLL	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.07%	0.66%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.14%	3.20%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19%	3.50%	-3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.45%	3.75%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.56%	3.75%	-3.19%

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBLL vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than CLOZ's 7.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	7.30%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	3.69%	4.08%	4.99%	4.63%	1.37%	0.03%	0.80%	2.08%	1.69%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLL and CLOZ in my portfolio?

TBLL and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLL or CLOZ?

CLOZ has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to TBLL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, TBLL or CLOZ?

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 9.03% vs 4.55% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBLL or CLOZ?

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBLL or CLOZ?

TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBLL or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 3.69% for TBLL.

What is the main difference between TBLL and CLOZ?

TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Eldridge. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.52 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.