PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLL vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLL vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TBLL having a 1.43% return and BILS slightly lower at 1.40%.


TBLL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*

BILS

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLL vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
1.43%4.21%5.11%5.01%1.11%-0.01%0.01%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
1.40%4.23%5.17%4.92%0.90%-0.08%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLL and BILS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.60

The correlation between TBLL and BILS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLL vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLL
TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLL vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLLBILSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+117.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

102.92

42.08

+60.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

416.84

129.91

+286.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3,533.11

1,442.41

+2,090.71

TBLL vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLL Sharpe Ratio is 20.94, which is comparable to the BILS Sharpe Ratio of 16.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLL and BILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLLBILSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.94

16.80

+4.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

7.53

10.79

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.26

9.79

-5.54

Drawdowns

TBLL vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and BILS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLLBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-0.41%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-0.03%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.36%

-0.04%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-0.38%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-0.04%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

TBLL vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.05%, while SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) has a volatility of 0.06%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLLBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.06%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

0.14%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19%

0.23%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.45%

0.31%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.56%

0.30%

+0.26%

TBLL vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLL vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, which matches BILS's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
3.81%4.08%4.99%4.63%1.37%0.03%0.80%2.08%1.69%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLL and BILS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILS has higher volatility (0.06%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs BILS's -0.41%.

On 5-year performance, TBLL leads with 3.35% vs 3.29% for BILS. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TBLL has performed better with a 3.35% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BILS.

TBLL and BILS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.81%.

TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.14% for BILS.

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 16.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLL and BILS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer