TBLHX vs. PRDGX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBLHX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund) and PRDGX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - TBLHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRDGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 3 years, TBLHX returned 15.73%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for PRDGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBLHX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PRDGX.

Performance

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBLHX having a 7.91% return and PRDGX slightly higher at 8.16%.

TBLHX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.20%
• 1Y: 19.16%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRDGX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 6.97%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 10.02%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLHX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund	7.91%	17.39%	12.59%	18.77%	-17.11%	3.56%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	8.16%	14.74%	13.48%	13.68%	-10.22%	9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLHX and PRDGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021	0.88

The correlation between TBLHX and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBLHX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLHX

TBLHX Risk / Return Rank: 58
TBLHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TBLHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TBLHX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TBLHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TBLHX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

PRDGX

PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBLHX	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.72	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.46	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.30	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	9.43	+1.14

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLHX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLHX drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLHX and PRDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLHX	PRDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-49.79%	+25.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-7.34%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.94%	-14.15%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-0.53%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-5.41%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.79%	+0.01%

Volatility

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 2.75%. This indicates that TBLHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLHX	PRDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	2.75%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	7.68%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	9.83%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	14.06%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	15.85%	-2.73%

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLHX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBLHX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TBLHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than PRDGX's 7.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.48%	8.02%	4.66%	2.78%	3.81%	2.00%	1.03%	2.33%	3.67%	1.82%	3.07%	7.57%
TBLHX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund	2.47%	2.67%	2.19%	2.10%	2.38%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLHX and PRDGX in my portfolio?

TBLHX and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLHX or PRDGX?

TBLHX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to PRDGX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLHX dropped -24.45% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBLHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.