PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLD vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust Common Stock (TBLD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLD achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.43% return.


TBLD

1D
0.84%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
10.22%
6M
12.00%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
10Y*

CGDV

1D
0.33%
1M
1.08%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.45%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLD vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TBLD
Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust Common Stock
10.22%31.88%14.02%18.01%-14.43%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.43%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLD and CGDV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.61

The correlation between TBLD and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLD vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLD
TBLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust Common Stock (TBLD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLDCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.72

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.38

12.64

-5.27

TBLD vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLD and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLD drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLD and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLDCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-21.82%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-9.75%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.88%

-14.28%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-1.46%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-3.58%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.09%

+0.76%

Volatility

TBLD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust Common Stock (TBLD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLDCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.64%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

9.90%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

12.27%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.57%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.57%

-0.54%

Dividends

TBLD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

TBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%
TBLD
Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust Common Stock
5.78%6.22%8.32%8.06%8.02%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLD and CGDV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to TBLD (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLD dropped -33.65% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLD and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer