TBJL vs. PBFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).
TBJL and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TBJL is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF. It was launched on Aug 17, 2020. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.
Performance
TBJL vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBJL vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TBJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July | -0.23% | 1.74% | -3.31% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | -0.36% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBJL achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's -0.36% return.
TBJL
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- -1.10%
- 5Y*
- -2.72%
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBJL vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TBJL vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
TBJL
PBFR
TBJL vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBJL | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | 1.37 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | 2.04 | -2.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.36 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 1.84 | -2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 10.85 | -11.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBJL | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 1.37 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 1.23 | -1.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBJL and PBFR is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TBJL vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
TBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TBJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
TBJL vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBJL drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBJL and PBFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBJL | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.36% | -8.50% | -20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -6.15% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.76% | -1.17% | -19.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -0.68% | -14.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.04% | +2.13% |
Volatility
TBJL vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) is 1.75%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that TBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBJL | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 2.46% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | 3.48% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07% | 8.18% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 7.13% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.82% | 7.13% | +3.69% |