PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBJL vs. FMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBJL vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBJL vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBJL
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July
-0.23%1.74%-3.16%4.12%-20.82%8.24%
FMAR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
2.73%9.69%14.61%20.39%-5.51%11.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBJL achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 2.73% return.


TBJL

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
-2.09%
3Y*
-1.10%
5Y*
-2.72%
10Y*

FMAR

1D
0.56%
1M
1.47%
YTD
2.73%
6M
4.94%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBJL vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBJL vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBJL
TBJL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAR
FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBJL vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBJLFMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

1.39

-1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

2.03

-2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.43

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

1.87

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.57

11.91

-12.48

TBJL vs. FMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the FMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBJL and FMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBJLFMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

1.39

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.96

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

0.99

-1.36

Correlation

The correlation between TBJL and FMAR is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TBJL vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBJL nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TBJL vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBJL drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, which is greater than FMAR's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBJL and FMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBJLFMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-14.36%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-8.31%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.57%

-14.36%

-14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.76%

0.00%

-20.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.46%

-2.21%

-13.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

1.30%

+1.87%

Volatility

TBJL vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) is 1.75%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that TBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBJLFMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

2.94%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

3.79%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07%

11.05%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.99%

10.49%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.82%

10.47%

+0.35%