PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIIX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIIX achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TBIIX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.22%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.94% annualized return.


TBIIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.30%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
1.22%
ALL TIME*
2.36%

FTHRX

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.17%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
1.94%
ALL TIME*
3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBIIX
TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund
-0.30%7.12%1.13%5.13%-13.61%-1.81%7.69%8.58%-0.25%3.43%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.29%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIIX and FTHRX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.91

The correlation between TBIIX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIIX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBIIX
TBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBIIXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.15

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.07

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

2.62

-0.94

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIIX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIIX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBIIXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-19.01%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.11%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-2.50%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-12.98%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.33%

-13.25%

-6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-0.96%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-3.06%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.86%

+0.36%

Volatility

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.79%. This indicates that TBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBIIXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.79%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

2.18%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

2.66%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

4.04%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

3.40%

+1.62%

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBIIX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

TBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than FTHRX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.72%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
TBIIX
TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund
3.64%3.73%3.14%2.44%2.11%2.07%3.17%2.82%2.46%2.44%2.31%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIIX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBIIX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to FTHRX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIIX dropped -19.33% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIIX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer