PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBHDX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund (TBHDX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBHDX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TBHDX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 6.15%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.


TBHDX

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.93%
YTD
4.46%
6M
7.36%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
6.15%

UCEQX

1D
0.56%
1M
5.39%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.38%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBHDX
Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund
4.46%21.81%0.20%12.36%-12.11%11.65%-4.40%18.60%-5.83%17.26%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
14.21%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TBHDX and UCEQX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.73

The correlation between TBHDX and UCEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBHDX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBHDX
TBHDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TBHDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBHDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBHDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TBHDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBHDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund (TBHDX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBHDXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

2.68

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

3.68

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.49

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.66

-2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.90

16.44

-13.54

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBHDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBHDX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBHDXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.68

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.73

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.71

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.69

-0.40

Drawdowns

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBHDX drawdown since its inception was -47.42%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBHDX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBHDXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.42%

-35.33%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-8.96%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-15.64%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.94%

-25.24%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

-35.33%

+1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

0.00%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-4.87%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

1.99%

+1.99%

Volatility

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund (TBHDX) is 3.45%, while USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that TBHDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBHDXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.67%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

9.71%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

12.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

15.27%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

16.50%

-2.62%

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBHDX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBHDX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

TBHDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than UCEQX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBHDX
Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund
7.99%8.35%6.54%3.73%9.81%23.53%8.39%11.76%22.82%0.94%4.35%12.96%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.45%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBHDX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCEQX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to TBHDX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBHDX dropped -47.42% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBHDX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer