TBFC vs. TDSA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) and TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TBFC is actively managed, while TDSA is passively managed. TBFC charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDSA.

Performance

TBFC vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TBFC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDSA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFC vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	2.92%
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF	0.00%

TBFC vs. TDSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TBFC	TDSA
Technology	21.1%	24.3%
Financial Services	18.0%	4.7%
Industrials	12.7%	6.7%
Healthcare	8.9%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	8.6%
Energy	7.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	3.1%
Communication Services	6.0%	6.5%
Basic Materials	5.7%	1.2%
Utilities	3.8%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	35.5%

Return for Risk

TBFC vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFC

TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 71
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFC vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBFC	TDSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBFC	TDSA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	—	—

Drawdowns

TBFC vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFC drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFC and TDSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFC	TDSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	0.00%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	0.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	0.00%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBFC	TDSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	0.00%	+6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.14%	0.00%	+7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.14%	0.00%	+7.14%

TBFC vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFC has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBFC vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison

TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	2.93%	3.28%	2.98%
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TBFC or TDSA?

On fees, TBFC is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBFC or TDSA?

TBFC is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBFC or TDSA?

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.

What is the main difference between TBFC and TDSA?

They also come from different issuers: Brinsmere and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TBFC and 0.83% for TDSA.