TBFC vs. TACK

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) and TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TBFC returned 13.00% vs 14.74% for TACK. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBFC charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TACK.

Performance

TBFC vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFC achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than TACK's 6.34% return.

TBFC

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TACK

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 6M: 5.07%
• 1Y: 14.74%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFC vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	4.92%	11.38%	8.22%
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	6.34%	10.93%	12.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TBFC and TACK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024	0.84

The correlation between TBFC and TACK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBFC vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFC

TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 63
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TACK

TACK Risk / Return Rank: 52
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFC vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBFC	TACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.54	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.19	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.53	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	7.91	+1.96

TBFC vs. TACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the TACK Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFC and TACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBFC vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFC drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFC and TACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFC	TACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-14.49%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-5.85%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	0.00%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-4.18%	+3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	1.87%	-0.55%

Volatility

TBFC vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison

The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBFC	TACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	2.87%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.88%	7.34%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.85%	9.65%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.28%	11.23%	-3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.28%	11.23%	-3.95%

TBFC vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFC has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBFC vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than TACK's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	1.19%	1.18%	1.26%	1.29%	0.89%
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.28%	2.98%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBFC and TACK in my portfolio?

TBFC and TACK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBFC or TACK?

TBFC has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to TACK (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBFC dropped -8.89% vs TACK's -14.49%.

Which ETF is better, TBFC or TACK?

On 1-year performance, TACK leads with 14.74% vs 13.00% for TBFC. On fees, TBFC is cheaper at 0.44% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBFC or TACK?

Over the 1-year period, TACK has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBFC or TACK?

TBFC is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBFC or TACK?

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.19% for TACK.

What is the main difference between TBFC and TACK?

They also come from different issuers: Brinsmere and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TBFC and 0.76% for TACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.