TBFC vs. LOTI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) and LOTI (Liberty One Tactical Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBFC charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for LOTI.

Performance

TBFC vs. LOTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFC achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than LOTI's 3.85% return.

TBFC

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOTI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFC vs. LOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	4.92%	2.30%
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	3.85%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TBFC and LOTI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

TBFC vs. LOTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFC

TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 63
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

LOTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFC vs. LOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBFC	LOTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	—	—

Drawdowns

TBFC vs. LOTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFC drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, which is greater than LOTI's maximum drawdown of -4.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFC and LOTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFC	LOTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-4.42%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-1.37%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-1.36%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBFC	LOTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.85%	5.75%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.28%	5.75%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.28%	5.75%	+1.53%

TBFC vs. LOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFC has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than LOTI's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBFC vs. LOTI - Dividend Comparison

TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than LOTI's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	1.60%	0.45%	0.00%
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.28%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBFC and LOTI in my portfolio?

TBFC and LOTI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TBFC or LOTI?

On fees, TBFC is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBFC or LOTI?

TBFC is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for LOTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBFC or LOTI?

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.60% for LOTI.

What is the main difference between TBFC and LOTI?

They also come from different issuers: Brinsmere and Liberty One. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TBFC and 1.01% for LOTI.