PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBCIX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBCIX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's 4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TBCIX has outperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 17.38%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.04% annualized return.


TBCIX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.78%
6M
0.46%
YTD
1.57%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
26.20%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
17.38%

MRFOX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.26%
6M
1.85%
YTD
4.26%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
1.57%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
4.26%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TBCIX and MRFOX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between TBCIX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBCIX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBCIXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.57

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

4.63

-2.50

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBCIX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBCIX drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBCIX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBCIXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-29.10%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.96%

-7.03%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

-7.91%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-12.98%

-30.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

-29.10%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-1.08%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-2.35%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

2.38%

+2.97%

Volatility

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 3.42%. This indicates that TBCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBCIXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.42%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

7.42%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

10.02%

+6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.09%

12.11%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

14.15%

+8.64%

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBCIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBCIX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

TBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than MRFOX's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.55%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.12%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBCIX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to MRFOX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBCIX dropped -43.26% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

MRFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBCIX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer