TBBK vs. CASH
TBBK (The Bancorp, Inc.) and CASH (Meta Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, TBBK returned 23.19%/yr vs 17.09%/yr for CASH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TBBK vs. CASH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBBK achieves a -19.86% return, which is significantly lower than CASH's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TBBK has outperformed CASH with an annualized return of 23.19%, while CASH has yielded a comparatively lower 17.09% annualized return.
TBBK
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -19.86%
- 6M
- -18.00%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
CASH
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -8.52%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.09%
TBBK vs. CASH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBBK The Bancorp, Inc. | -19.86% | 28.29% | 36.49% | 35.87% | 12.13% | 85.42% | 5.24% | 62.94% | -19.43% | 25.70% |
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc. | 12.58% | -3.25% | 39.47% | 23.45% | -27.48% | 63.82% | 0.94% | 89.68% | -36.81% | -9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBBK and CASH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2004 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, TBBK and CASH have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TBBK:
$2.30B
CASH:
$1.74B
TBBK:
$5.09
CASH:
$8.39
TBBK:
10.62
CASH:
9.52
TBBK:
0.38
CASH:
0.60
TBBK:
3.58
CASH:
2.81
TBBK:
3.31
CASH:
2.04
TBBK:
$686.06M
CASH:
$639.61M
TBBK:
$394.85M
CASH:
$477.70M
TBBK:
$230.08M
CASH:
$180.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBBK vs. CASH — Risk / Return Rank
TBBK
CASH
TBBK vs. CASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) and Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBBK | CASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 0.23 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBBK | CASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.18 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.26 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.30 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
TBBK vs. CASH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBBK drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than CASH's maximum drawdown of -83.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBBK and CASH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBBK | CASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.68% | -83.66% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.92% | -22.21% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -25.20% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.94% | -50.84% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.77% | -64.90% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.65% | -20.05% | -12.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.56% | -22.89% | -24.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.99% | 10.80% | +9.19% |
Volatility
TBBK vs. CASH - Volatility Comparison
The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) at 8.24%. This indicates that TBBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBBK | CASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 8.24% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.10% | 22.74% | +8.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.43% | 28.77% | +14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.10% | 33.62% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 41.28% | +9.51% |
Dividends
TBBK vs. CASH - Dividend Comparison
TBBK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc. | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.96% | 0.56% | 0.51% | 1.13% |
TBBK The Bancorp, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TBBK vs. CASH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bancorp, Inc. and Meta Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TBBK vs. CASH - Profitability Comparison
TBBK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TBBK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TBBK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 60.07M and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in a net margin of 82.8%.
CASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 72.84M and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TBBK and CASH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBBK has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to CASH (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBBK dropped -92.68% vs CASH's -83.66%.
CASH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBBK and CASH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer