TAXT vs. QLC
TAXT (Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TAXT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
TAXT vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXT achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 11.39% return.
TAXT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
TAXT vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.49% | 3.96% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 11.39% | 10.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXT and QLC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXT vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
TAXT
QLC
TAXT vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAXT | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.80 | 0.80 | +2.00 |
Drawdowns
TAXT vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXT drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXT and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXT | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -35.86% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.74% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -4.54% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
TAXT vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXT | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 12.38% | -9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 16.82% | -14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 18.42% | -15.89% |
TAXT vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAXT vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
TAXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than QLC's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.55% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXT and QLC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.
TAXT has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.88% for QLC.
TAXT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. TAXT tracks ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index, while QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXT and 0.25% for QLC.
Find the right allocation for TAXT and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer