TAXS vs. QLC
TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TAXS is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
TAXS vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXS achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 11.39% return.
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
TAXS vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.93% | 1.22% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 11.39% | 10.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXS and QLC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXS vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
TAXS
QLC
TAXS vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAXS | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.78 | 0.80 | +1.98 |
Drawdowns
TAXS vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXS drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXS and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXS | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -35.86% | +35.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.74% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -4.54% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
TAXS vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXS | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00% | 12.38% | -11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 16.82% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 18.42% | -17.42% |
TAXS vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAXS vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
TAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than QLC's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXS and QLC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.
TAXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.88% for QLC.
TAXS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index, while QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXS and 0.25% for QLC.
Find the right allocation for TAXS and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer