TAXS vs. PZT
TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index while PZT tracks the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for PZT.
Performance
TAXS vs. PZT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PZT's 3.19% return.
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZT
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
TAXS vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.99% | 1.22% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.19% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXS and PZT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXS vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank
TAXS
PZT
TAXS vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAXS | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.85 | 0.38 | +2.47 |
Drawdowns
TAXS vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXS drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum PZT drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXS and PZT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXS | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -22.73% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -1.11% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -3.91% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
TAXS vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXS | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00% | 4.74% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 6.63% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 6.96% | -5.96% |
TAXS vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAXS vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison
TAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than PZT's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.57% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXS and PZT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.
TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index, while PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXS and 0.28% for PZT.
Find the right allocation for TAXS and PZT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer