TAXS vs. IBMO
TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index while IBMO tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.
Performance
TAXS vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXS achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than IBMO's 1.22% return.
TAXS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.08% | 1.22% |
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.22% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXS and IBMO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXS vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank
TAXS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBMO
TAXS vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAXS | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAXS vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXS drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXS and IBMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXS | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -14.77% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -2.29% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility
TAXS vs. IBMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXS | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97% | 1.13% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.97% | 2.14% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.97% | 4.48% | -3.51% |
TAXS vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAXS vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison
TAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than IBMO's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.03% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXS and IBMO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMO.
IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 2.03% for TAXS.
TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index, while IBMO tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXS and 0.18% for IBMO.
Find the right allocation for TAXS and IBMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer