TAXF vs. AMUN
TAXF (American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
TAXF vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXF achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.13% return.
TAXF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXF vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 1.97% | 0.38% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.13% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXF and AMUN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXF vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
TAXF
AMUN
TAXF vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAXF | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAXF | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 2.09 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
TAXF vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXF drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXF and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXF | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -0.61% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -0.09% | -3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility
TAXF vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXF | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 1.01% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 1.01% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 1.01% | +3.65% |
TAXF vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAXF vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
TAXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than AMUN's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.89% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 3.47% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.93% | 2.05% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 2.64% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXF and AMUN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TAXF.
TAXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TAXF and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for TAXF and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer