PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXE vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXE vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (TAXE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TAXE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.08%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXE vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXE vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXE
TAXE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TAXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXE vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (TAXE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXEIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

TAXE vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXEIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

Drawdowns

TAXE vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXE drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXE and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXEIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

0.00%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

Volatility

TAXE vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXEIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

0.00%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.15%

0.00%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.15%

0.00%

+3.15%

TAXE vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TAXE vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

TAXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for TAXE.

TAXE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TAXE and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXE and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer