TAVFX vs. VGPMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TAVFX (Third Avenue Value Fund) and VGPMX (Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TAVFX returned 11.06%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for VGPMX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAVFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for VGPMX.

Performance

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAVFX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 14.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TAVFX having a 11.06% annualized return and VGPMX not far behind at 10.59%.

TAVFX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 10.91%
• 6M: 10.76%
• 1Y: 38.11%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 15.02%
• 10Y*: 11.06%

VGPMX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 15.06%
• 1Y: 54.65%
• 3Y*: 29.12%
• 5Y*: 20.35%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAVFX Third Avenue Value Fund	10.91%	35.93%	-2.43%	20.26%	17.46%	22.39%	7.76%	12.95%	-25.95%	8.81%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	14.50%	65.96%	5.78%	10.06%	7.34%	19.50%	17.21%	20.67%	-32.26%	13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TAVFX and VGPMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1991	0.44

Over the past year, TAVFX and VGPMX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TAVFX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAVFX

TAVFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
TAVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TAVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TAVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TAVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TAVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

VGPMX

VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAVFX	VGPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	3.15	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.83	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.54	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	4.36	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.26	17.29	-4.03

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAVFX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAVFX drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAVFX and VGPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAVFX	VGPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.11%	-78.85%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-12.80%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.11%	-14.63%	-51.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.11%	-22.71%	-43.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.11%	-54.59%	-11.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	-5.49%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-34.51%	+24.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.22%	-0.33%

Volatility

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) is 5.15%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that TAVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAVFX	VGPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	6.91%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	15.08%	-3.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	17.74%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.03%	17.50%	+64.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.33%	20.89%	+39.44%

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAVFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAVFX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

TAVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than VGPMX's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TAVFX Third Avenue Value Fund	6.25%	6.93%	9.86%	4.48%	5.67%	3.74%	0.70%	5.95%	4.45%	3.03%	8.24%	8.43%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	3.41%	2.59%	2.68%	3.22%	3.27%	3.26%	2.03%	2.39%	3.02%	0.02%	1.72%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAVFX and VGPMX in my portfolio?

TAVFX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAVFX or VGPMX?

VGPMX has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to TAVFX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAVFX dropped -66.11% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.