TASVX vs. BOSVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TASVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund) and BOSVX (Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TASVX returned 10.68%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for BOSVX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TASVX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BOSVX.

Performance

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TASVX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly lower than BOSVX's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TASVX has underperformed BOSVX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while BOSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.

TASVX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 6M: 15.28%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 23.72%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

BOSVX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 19.41%
• 6M: 18.62%
• 1Y: 43.30%
• 3Y*: 19.28%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund	15.17%	13.71%	18.76%	16.92%	-11.44%	41.68%	-3.08%	15.56%	-19.00%	6.21%
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund	19.41%	9.78%	4.21%	18.18%	-4.27%	48.03%	0.83%	13.90%	-17.15%	5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TASVX and BOSVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2011	0.97

The correlation between TASVX and BOSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TASVX vs. BOSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TASVX

TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 73
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BOSVX

BOSVX Risk / Return Rank: 72
BOSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BOSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BOSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BOSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BOSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TASVX	BOSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.34	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.27	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	5.55	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.02	16.24	-0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TASVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the BOSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TASVX and BOSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TASVX	BOSVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.34	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.44	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.46	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.50	0.00

Drawdowns

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TASVX drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, roughly equal to the maximum BOSVX drawdown of -57.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TASVX and BOSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TASVX	BOSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.79%	-57.14%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-8.27%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.91%	-28.71%	+4.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.62%	-28.71%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.79%	-57.14%	-2.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.00%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-8.58%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.82%	-0.25%

Volatility

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) is 4.25%, while Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that TASVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TASVX	BOSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	4.64%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.51%	13.25%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.21%	19.64%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.61%	22.62%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.46%	25.05%	+1.41%

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TASVX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BOSVX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TASVX vs. BOSVX - Dividend Comparison

TASVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than BOSVX's 8.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund	8.36%	9.99%	9.71%	8.55%	21.96%	4.12%	1.21%	0.99%	10.36%	6.66%	0.89%	1.00%
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund	1.12%	1.29%	26.54%	3.43%	22.08%	1.46%	1.38%	2.81%	10.87%	13.42%	1.83%	45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TASVX and BOSVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, TASVX and BOSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TASVX or BOSVX?

BOSVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to TASVX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TASVX dropped -59.79% vs BOSVX's -57.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.