PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARBX vs. TMCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund (TARBX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TARBX having a 1.68% return and TMCPX slightly lower at 1.66%. Over the past 10 years, TARBX has underperformed TMCPX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while TMCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


TARBX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
4.66%

TMCPX

1D
1.98%
1M
5.92%
YTD
1.66%
6M
0.38%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TARBX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund
1.68%6.43%8.29%13.26%-8.37%9.60%4.71%12.71%-2.37%0.40%
TMCPX
Touchstone Mid Cap Fund
1.66%4.87%8.48%27.48%-15.62%15.21%12.56%39.44%-3.14%20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TARBX and TMCPX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARBX vs. TMCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARBX
TARBX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TARBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TARBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TMCPX
TMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund (TARBX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARBXTMCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.11

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.70

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

1.86

+10.06

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the TMCPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARBX and TMCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARBX drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, smaller than the maximum TMCPX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARBX and TMCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARBXTMCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-58.03%

+36.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-13.48%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

-21.47%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-21.47%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.48%

-35.54%

+14.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-4.44%

+4.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-9.61%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

5.11%

-4.65%

Volatility

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund (TARBX) is 0.76%, while Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that TARBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARBXTMCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

5.20%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

13.26%

-11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

16.80%

-14.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

17.94%

-13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

18.54%

-13.48%

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than TMCPX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARBX vs. TMCPX - Dividend Comparison

TARBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than TMCPX's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TARBX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund
7.75%7.28%7.84%7.94%6.32%6.40%6.49%3.83%2.27%4.45%2.85%1.84%
TMCPX
Touchstone Mid Cap Fund
2.17%2.20%2.52%0.92%1.43%2.80%1.93%5.18%3.95%1.10%0.58%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARBX and TMCPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMCPX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to TARBX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARBX dropped -21.48% vs TMCPX's -58.03%.

TARBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARBX and TMCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer