TAPR vs. XAPR
TAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TAPR returned 6.62% vs 8.79% for XAPR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.
Performance
TAPR vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAPR achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 3.39% return.
TAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAPR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAPR vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 | 2.13% | 6.44% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 3.39% | 10.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAPR and XAPR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TAPR and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAPR vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank
TAPR
XAPR
TAPR vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAPR | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 2.06 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 13.37 | -9.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.55 | 70.60 | -51.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAPR | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 4.31 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 1.88 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
TAPR vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAPR drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum XAPR drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAPR and XAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAPR | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -6.18% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.75% | -0.66% | -1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.16% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.18% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.12% | +0.22% |
Volatility
TAPR vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) is 0.30%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that TAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAPR | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 0.75% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 1.31% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22% | 2.05% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.18% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.18% | -2.45% |
TAPR vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAPR vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAPR nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TAPR and XAPR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to TAPR (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAPR dropped -2.60% vs XAPR's -6.18%.
On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 6.62% for TAPR. On fees, TAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.
TAPR and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TAPR and 0.85% for XAPR.
XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAPR and XAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer