PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
-7.15%-15.53%-3.43%22.15%14.39%4.12%-15.20%-0.44%-29.88%-14.11%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAP achieves a -7.15% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TAP has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -5.48%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


TAP

1D
-0.37%
1M
-10.80%
YTD
-7.15%
6M
-4.86%
1Y
-27.15%
3Y*
-2.91%
5Y*
-0.82%
10Y*
-5.48%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAP
TAP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAP^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.06

0.92

-1.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.47

1.41

-2.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.21

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

1.41

-2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

6.61

-7.91

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAP and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAP^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

0.92

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.61

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.19

0.68

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between TAP and ^GSPC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAP drawdown since its inception was -67.73%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAP and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TAP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.73%

-56.78%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.47%

-12.14%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.21%

-25.43%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.73%

-33.92%

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.78%

-5.78%

-45.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-10.75%

-11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.57%

2.60%

+17.97%

Volatility

TAP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that TAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TAP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

5.37%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.09%

9.55%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.66%

18.33%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.93%

16.90%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%

18.05%

+10.34%