PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TANDX vs. MEQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TANDX achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than MEQFX's 0.15% return.


TANDX

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.12%
6M
-5.57%
YTD
-6.75%
1Y
-7.42%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.41%

MEQFX

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.51%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
-5.30%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
10.81%
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-6.75%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
0.15%-2.58%24.99%19.53%-9.50%43.58%-4.00%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TANDX and MEQFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.75

The correlation between TANDX and MEQFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TANDX vs. MEQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MEQFX
MEQFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MEQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TANDXMEQFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.93

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.42

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-0.70

-0.27

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TANDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the MEQFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TANDX and MEQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TANDX drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than MEQFX's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TANDX and MEQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TANDXMEQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.98%

-55.38%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.88%

-17.43%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.98%

-17.43%

-76.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.98%

-19.48%

-74.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.48%

-11.64%

-81.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-12.19%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.79%

10.37%

-1.58%

Volatility

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Volatility Comparison

Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) at 4.03%. This indicates that TANDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TANDXMEQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.03%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

9.51%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

17.07%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

596.04%

17.55%

+578.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

491.15%

19.60%

+471.55%

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TANDX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQFX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

TANDX vs. MEQFX - Dividend Comparison

TANDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, while MEQFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
0.00%0.00%4.48%0.98%2.13%27.90%0.00%9.17%3.40%30.28%5.96%11.63%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
6.62%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TANDX and MEQFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TANDX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to MEQFX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TANDX dropped -93.98% vs MEQFX's -55.38%.

MEQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TANDX and MEQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer