TAN vs. SPWR
TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index, while SPWR (SunPower Corporation) is a stock. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TAN vs. SPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TAN
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 21.93%
- YTD
- 47.13%
- 6M
- 51.73%
- 1Y
- 127.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
SPWR
- 1D
- -4.85%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAN vs. SPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.47% |
SPWR SunPower Corporation | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and SPWR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAN vs. SPWR — Risk / Return Rank
TAN
SPWR
TAN vs. SPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and SunPower Corporation (SPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAN | SPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.06 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAN | SPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | -1.89 | +1.77 |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. SPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than SPWR's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and SPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAN | SPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.29% | -7.55% | -87.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.81% | -7.55% | -59.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.51% | -3.46% | -75.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | — | — |
Volatility
TAN vs. SPWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAN | SPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.21% | 63.96% | -26.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.74% | 63.96% | -24.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.98% | 63.96% | -25.98% |
Dividends
TAN vs. SPWR - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAN nor SPWR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPWR SunPower Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.69% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAN and SPWR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TAN and SPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer