PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAIL vs. GMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TAIL vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TAIL vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
1.76%5.48%-9.62%-13.06%
GMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
2.32%9.29%12.14%11.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 2.32% return.


TAIL

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.76%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
-4.58%
5Y*
-6.94%
10Y*

GMAR

1D
0.48%
1M
1.40%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.36%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAIL vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TAIL vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAR
GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIL vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAILGMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.46

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

2.14

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.46

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.84

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.13

11.96

-11.83

TAIL vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIL and GMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAILGMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.46

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

1.71

-2.14

Correlation

The correlation between TAIL and GMAR is -0.53. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TAIL vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.22%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%
GMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TAIL vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than GMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and GMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TAILGMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-9.11%

-43.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-6.85%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.46%

0.00%

-47.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.71%

-0.57%

-28.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.30%

1.05%

+12.25%

Volatility

TAIL vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 2.22%. This indicates that TAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TAILGMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

2.22%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

2.87%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

8.50%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

6.96%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

6.96%

+8.10%