TAIBX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX).

TAIBX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 5, 1993. MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020.

Performance

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TAIBX PGIM Core Bond Fund	-0.33%	7.36%	1.44%	5.89%	-14.59%	-1.73%	5.97%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	-0.13%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIBX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's -0.13% return.

TAIBX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: -0.05%
• 10Y*: 1.72%

MCDWX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 1.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

TAIBX

PGIM Core Bond Fund

MCDWX

Manning & Napier Credit Series

Return for Risk

TAIBX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIBX

TAIBX Risk / Return Rank: 42
TAIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TAIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TAIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TAIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TAIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAIBX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.51	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	2.12	-0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	2.26	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	8.14	-3.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIBX and MCDWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAIBX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.51	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.37	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.58	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between TAIBX and MCDWX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

TAIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than MCDWX's 4.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TAIBX PGIM Core Bond Fund	4.07%	4.41%	3.77%	3.47%	2.48%	1.98%	3.14%	3.03%	3.03%	2.53%	2.55%	2.49%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.43%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIBX drawdown since its inception was -20.09%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIBX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAIBX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.09%	-15.96%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-2.20%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.91%	-15.96%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	-1.63%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-4.24%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.61%	+0.44%

Volatility

TAIBX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TAIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAIBX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	1.42%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	2.00%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.46%	3.31%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.05%	4.62%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.02%	4.41%	+0.61%