PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAIAX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIAX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, TAIAX has underperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.


TAIAX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.87%
YTD
6.28%
6M
6.84%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.85%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
6.28%13.27%10.09%11.74%-10.18%13.47%7.46%16.26%-2.17%14.25%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TAIAX and MHELX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between TAIAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAIAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIAX
TAIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TAIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAIAXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

4.64

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

15.69

-2.98

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAIAXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.06

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.24

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.43

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.33

+0.73

Drawdowns

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIAX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIAX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAIAXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-61.24%

+39.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-8.52%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-30.81%

+22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-32.01%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.42%

-39.02%

+17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-12.93%

+10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.51%

-1.18%

Volatility

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) is 2.01%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that TAIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAIAXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

4.53%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.30%

15.24%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

19.23%

-12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.62%

21.00%

-13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.19%

20.97%

-12.78%

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIAX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAIAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

TAIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
4.87%5.18%5.16%4.29%4.37%3.40%2.65%4.01%4.54%4.04%2.77%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAIAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to TAIAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIAX dropped -21.42% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

TAIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAIAX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer