TAFM vs. FISVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TAFM (AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF) and FISVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund) are both funds - TAFM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FISVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, TAFM returned 7.39% vs 43.18% for FISVX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAFM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FISVX.

Performance

TAFM vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFM achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than FISVX's 18.90% return.

TAFM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 7.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FISVX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 18.90%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 43.18%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFM vs. FISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	1.91%	4.21%	2.54%	1.51%
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund	18.90%	12.70%	8.16%	4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFM and FISVX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

TAFM vs. FISVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFM

TAFM Risk / Return Rank: 68
TAFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TAFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TAFM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TAFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TAFM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FISVX

FISVX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFM vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAFM	FISVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.54	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.54	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.43	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	5.34	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	18.11	-8.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAFM vs. FISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFM Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FISVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFM and FISVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAFM	FISVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.54	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.42	+0.42

Drawdowns

TAFM vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFM drawdown since its inception was -4.74%, smaller than the maximum FISVX drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFM and FISVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAFM	FISVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-44.66%	+39.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.69%	-8.54%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.24%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-10.34%	+9.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	2.51%	-1.76%

Volatility

TAFM vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) is 1.00%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TAFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAFM	FISVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	4.89%	-3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.15%	11.97%	-9.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22%	17.95%	-14.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.95%	21.71%	-16.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	26.74%	-21.79%

TAFM vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAFM vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison

TAFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than FISVX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund	1.83%	2.18%	1.70%	2.06%	3.69%	9.55%	1.33%	0.62%
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	3.64%	3.51%	3.35%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAFM and FISVX in my portfolio?

TAFM and FISVX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAFM or FISVX?

FISVX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to TAFM (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFM dropped -4.74% vs FISVX's -44.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.