TAFI vs. FWD
TAFI (AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAFI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TAFI returned 3.68%/yr vs 39.60%/yr for FWD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAFI charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
TAFI vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAFI achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 40.49% return.
TAFI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 40.49%
- 6M
- 41.09%
- 1Y
- 78.25%
- 3Y*
- 39.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAFI vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TAFI AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 4.35% | 2.48% | 3.01% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 40.49% | 32.00% | 29.23% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAFI and FWD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAFI vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
TAFI
FWD
TAFI vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | 3.26 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | 3.86 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.52 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 6.17 | -2.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.99 | 21.99 | -10.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 3.26 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 1.68 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
TAFI vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAFI drawdown since its inception was -2.00%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFI and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -29.02% | +27.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.21% | -13.03% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.87% | -29.02% | +27.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -4.07% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 3.66% | -3.32% |
Volatility
TAFI vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) is 0.46%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that TAFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 7.76% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.95% | 19.00% | -18.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 24.16% | -22.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 24.74% | -22.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 24.74% | -22.76% |
TAFI vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAFI has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAFI vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
TAFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAFI AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF | 3.15% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.27% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAFI and FWD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWD has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to TAFI (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFI dropped -2.00% vs FWD's -29.02%.
On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 39.60% vs 3.68% for TAFI. On fees, TAFI is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, TAFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 39.60% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAFI is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
TAFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
TAFI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FWD is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for TAFI and 0.65% for FWD.
FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAFI and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer